GLMR is excited to announce the continued growth of our Life Sciences practice with the addition of two highly accomplished senior patent attorneys, Jenna and Mel. Both bring extensive experience in intellectual property law, bolstering our team’s expertise and...
Biotechnology Expansion We are pleased to introduce the most recent addition to our team, Melissa Erce. Mel joins us after many years working in large IP firms, skillfully handling both foreign and local biotechnology clients. GLMR ranked for both Patent Prosecution...
We are excited to announce that GLMR has been ranked by IP STARS as a notable firm for Trade Mark Prosecution. Our amazing Trade Marks Team has been working tirelessly behind the scenes to help our AU/NZ clients secure and negotiate rights abroad as well as at home,...
It has been a busy year, and the excellence of our IP team in Australia and New Zealand has been recognised by a gamut of organisations. We're proud of these wins and look forward to what 2024 has to bring: Managing IP (IP STARS) A few attorneys from the GLMR team...
While significant milestones are achieved in a fast-growing firm with a rapid frequency, it is important to recognise achievements in personal and team development. Promotion to Special Counsel Since joining GLMR, both David and Edward have taken leaps and bounds in...
We are proud to announce our continued sponsorship of the UTS Startups Awards in 2022, with a cash prize of $1000 together with an IP audit valued at $1000.
We are excited to announce the addition of five sought-after Australian Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys to the GLMR Intellectual Property family. Expanding the Family Over the past year, GLMR has experienced record growth. Senior attorneys were attracted to GLMR for...
In a recent decision the cloudy area of patent entitlement and inventive concept arose yet again. Such cases are always problematic because they usually involve inventors and companies who have not sufficiently documented an inventive process.
The Full Federal Court has handed down their judgement in Commissioner of Patents v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd, overturning orders of the primary judge (Burley J) that found that an innovation patent directed toward an electronic gaming machine was patentable subject matter.
